Site icon

Google May Junk 10,000 ‘Poor Performers’ – Darlinez News.

<p> &lbrack;ad&lowbar;1&rsqb;<br &sol;>&NewLine;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<div>&NewLine;<div class&equals;"entry-content column content primary is-two-thirds">&NewLine;<div class&equals;"" style&equals;"padding-bottom&colon; 10px&semi;">&NewLine;<div class&equals;"">&NewLine;<p>&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<span class&equals;"tag is-dark is-uppercase">Technology<&sol;span>&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<div class&equals;"byline-container">&NewLine;<div class&equals;"post-date is-italic has-text-grey is-size-7 has-text-weight-medium ">&NewLine;<p>November 18&comma; 2022 10&colon;30 am<&sol;p>&NewLine;<&sol;p><&sol;div>&NewLine;<&sol;p><&sol;div>&NewLine;<&sol;p><&sol;div>&NewLine;<&sol;p><&sol;div>&NewLine;<&sol;p><&sol;div>&NewLine;<p>The Information reports that Google may want management to pick which 10&comma;000 people are its poorest performers&period; This is likely an advanced warning that these people will be fired&period; It adds to the tech layoff bloodbath&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The Information claims low performers are chosen based &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;in terms of their impact for the business&period;” The move also may save Google payment of bonuses&comma; which is another way to cut costs&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>A poor performer label is hard to apply&period; Have these people been poor performers recently&quest; Are they likely to have an outsized influence on Google’s success in a few years&quest; Google aims to put 6&percnt; of its workers into the special bucket&period; All the more reason to dump them when the time comes&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The Google plan is another sign of employee overbuilding among America’s largest tech companies&period; Amazon and Meta already have announced specific numbers of cuts&period; Twitter&comma; a case of its own&comma; has let over 4&comma;000 people go&period; That number is likely to rise&comma; although CEO Elon Musk is asking back people he thinks are important&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Overbuilding has resulted in misplaced optimism among American businesses for decades&comma; if not longer&period; People are added to expand companies with new projects expected to increase sales&period; This is in contrast to keeping headcount steady to do a good job on successful products already in the field&period; CEO overreach but cannot be helped&period; The premium of growth over profits and stability is just too great&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<section id&equals;"email-subscribe" class&equals;"section section-email-sub single-email-sub"><&excl;-- div&period;svg-icon --><&sol;p>&NewLine;<div class&equals;"container">&NewLine;<div class&equals;"subscribe-message" style&equals;"line-height&colon; 1&period;3&semi;">&NewLine;<p>Get Our Free Investment Newsletter<&sol;p>&NewLine;<&sol;p><&sol;div>&NewLine;<&sol;p><&sol;div>&NewLine;<&sol;section>&NewLine;<p>The other factor CEOs who add employees miss is that the economy always slows&period; The only difference is when it will slow and how long&period; The current recession could last well into next year and worsen&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Another common part of the layoff process is that chief executives often admit they were wrong to build headcounts too high&period; Yet&comma; they rarely lose their jobs and their pay packages remain huge&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Google may junk 10&comma;000 people&comma; but CEO Sundar Pichai is not going anywhere&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<&excl;-- &num;post-footer--><&sol;p><&sol;div>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version